Answer:
An important difference between interest groups and political parties are their interests in relation to the rule of the country.
Explanation:
The biggest difference between <em>political parties</em> and <em>interest groups</em> is that political parties want to become a power and rule the country while on the other hand interest groups want to influence those who rule the country, with their ideologies.
Also one of the other differences is that interest groups have more members than political parties.
Answer:
![\boxed {\boxed {\sf A. \ Government \ power \ should \ be \ separated \ into \ three \ parts }}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cboxed%20%7B%5Cboxed%20%7B%5Csf%20A.%20%5C%20Government%20%5C%20power%20%5C%20should%20%5C%20be%20%5C%20separated%20%5C%20into%20%5C%20three%20%5C%20parts%20%7D%7D)
Explanation:
Montesquieu was a French philosopher whose ideas influenced many governments, including the United States.
Montesquieu wrote a book called The Spirit of Law. In this book he recognized that excess power was not good, so he introduced an idea known as separation of power. This would separate the government into multiple branches, so that one person/group couldn't take over.
We see this in our US Constitution. There are three branchs: executive, judicial, and legislative. Each branch has different powers and can "check" the others.
The best answer choice is A: government power should be separated into three parts
The answer is D I'm in 6th
Rice fell by ⅔<span>
between 1929 and 1932. The price of persisted high all over in Asia in the
summer of 1930. In 1930, Japan had a
very abundant rice harvest. Before, the Japanese government was trailing a
deflationary policy in order to sustain the yen, which had just been pegged to
the gold standard. The twice impact of deflation and the rich harvest
caused the rice price to decrease by about one-third in October 1930. This
should have been an only local concern since Japan did not export or import
rice, but grain traders all over the world understood this as an indication
that the rice price would now be part the fate of the wheat price. In November
1930, the rice price in Liverpool was bargained by half, and Calcutta followed
the Liverpool precedent in January 1931. At that point, the rice price
experienced a free fall, and by 1933 rice was low-priced than wheat in India.
Actually, the making, consumption, and export volume of rice did not drop very
much in this period—only the price continued to be low, and so did the income
of the producers.</span>
<span>The American public was shocked by her account of John D. Rockefeller's ruthless business practices. I hope that helps :) </span>