The correct answer is Punishment
In the Skinner's interpretation, when punishing, the reduction observed in the response does not represent a true reduction in executing such a response, but in a strengthening of competitive responses. What would be the competitive responses? They would be the escape or the avoidance! Thus, when we punish behavior we are simply eluding or avoiding and not teaching better adapted behavior.
the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
1) repeal
2) boycott
3) intolerable act
4) parliament (?)
5) stamp act
6) first continental congress
8) boston massacre
9) battle of bunkers hill
Steamboats. Steamboats positively effected the world because they made the transportation of goods more efficient and economical. Travel time was cut in half and were a compliment of the railroads, both for commercial and passenger transportation. Steamboats were independent on the wind speed and direction.
C. took an anti civil rights stand
