Explanation:
The structures of absolute monarchy and the authoritarian state [the Christian Church], who were the dominating sources of governance and learning, were attacked by Enlightenment philosophers, who thought that reason will lead to general and absolute truths. The excesses of both institutions were the basis for this critique.
Answer:
Explanation:
India was a superpower in that period with a world economy share of 24.4% in 1700 to 4.2% in 1950. Britain had killed over 4 million Indian during the begal famine and left India in a awful condition. East India trade company the company made India one of the wealthiest countries in the world ,. Britain seized it and looted the silicon and golden trade routes. Brought trade and influence into the country basically owning the global textile trade. Another was raw materials like jute and cotton with their rich agriculture They had very good raw goods such a Dimond and jewels and coffee and spices. Drawing on nearly two centuries of detailed data on tax and trade, Patnaik calculated that Britain drained a total of nearly $45 trillion from India during the period 1765 to 1938. It's a staggering sum. It is estimated that over 15 million people died. India had fallen below poverty and had alot of conflicts due to that aswell which led to the partition of India - Pakistan - Bangladesh and a still on going war with Muslims vs Hindus
A massive topic for this could be oil. You could talk about OPEC and the different types of technologies involved
Answer:
Everyone in the world
Explanation:
He says "The first is freedom of speech and expression–everywhere in the world."
And, "The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way–everywhere in the world."
And " The third is freedom from want–which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants-everywhere in the world."
And "The fourth is freedom from fear–which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor–anywhere in the world."
