1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Degger [83]
3 years ago
13

The US government established a federal district court covering Indian Territory and more than half of

History
1 answer:
Aleksandr-060686 [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Lawlessness and crimes we're becoming the thing of the day in the Indian territory, the Federal government had to set up a district court that covers the territory

Explanation:

Lawlessness and crimes we're becoming the thing of the day in the Indian territory, the Federal government had to set up a district court that covers the territory. These conditions existed based on how the federal government had set up Indian territory law

You might be interested in
Read the article titled "Trans-Saharan Migration Routes to North Africa and the EU: Historical Roots and Current Trends." Why do
ehidna [41]
<span>Tens of thousands of sub-Saharan Africans try to cross the Mediterranean each year because of various reasons: many tries to escape a life built on poverty and misery, other tries to get out from a very unstable country were they might not survive long or were there is a war in act, others tries to find a better life in the European countries, because there are no resources left in their own,
---
These refugees are commonly portrayed as dangerous people, perhaps people that come in the European country to stole jobs from Eupoean, or to take bits of help from the country there are in without contributing to the country, or they are criminals that do not want to work or pay taxes, or sometimes they are also portrayed as terrorist.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(WILL GIVE BRAINLY TO WHOEVER IS RIGHT!) Select the correct answer.
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

Explanation:

A) Bush V. Gore was about a presidential election dispute.

B) Gideon V. Wainwright was about not being able to afford someone to represent you.

C) Miranda V. Arizona enforced the Miranda Rights.

D) United States V. Nixon was about the affair in which they ordered tape recordings to be used in court.

None of these seem correct to the answer as Marbury v. Madison seems a much better choice. If I had to chose, I'd probably choose B or C.

3 0
2 years ago
What were both nobles and knights obligated to do?
olga nikolaevna [1]
They were obligated to fulfill their duty of fighting for the King and their Homelands.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the geneva accords provide for?
Zinaida [17]
I guessed b 
but idk none of this stuff so 

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does Germany have two capitals ?
alexandr1967 [171]
No, not anymore, since Germany was unified in 1989
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who did Thomas Jefferson accused of tyranny in the Declaration of Independence
    10·1 answer
  • Which English reformer called for change in the church during the 1300's
    12·1 answer
  • According to Castiglione , what was the ideal renaissance person
    10·1 answer
  • Who rejected the idea that gods affected human history
    12·1 answer
  • Question 13 of 16 Which statement best reflects Patriots' feelings during the Revolutionary War?
    12·2 answers
  • What are the government branches
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a description of the presidency of Andrew Johnson?
    12·1 answer
  • What was the result of the 1964 election?
    12·1 answer
  • Describe how the National War Labor Board (NWLB) and labor unions manage to keep the peace amongst industries and workers, and p
    7·1 answer
  • Who tryna help me out with history ?I really need help I have back up assignments And it’s hard
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!