Answer:
1. It Is a clear expression of fake democracy. The term "free election" doesn't entirely make sense in a country where any distinction between the ruling party and the government has been almost completely erased. Syria is considered a unitary republic with a semi-presidential style of government. However, the controlling parties practice a highly authoritarian regime with most of the political power in the AL-Assad family's hands. People doesn't have more option if the want to "live".
2. If I live in that country, I think I feel like a hostage. Elections over there aren't free, and they're certainly not fair. The resulting optics are not democratic enough. They buy the government a minimum of democratic credibility abroad without seriously imperiling its hold on power.
Explanation:
It split the Empire into two separate halves>
Now what you want to do is you want to hook your reader like Gun violence is a problem in our society today that should instantly hook your reader.
"mi casa es tu casa" is how you spell it
One critical difference in the way the US government responds to crime today in comparison with the 17th Century is that Crime Response today has been so much enhanced with the use of Technology as well as data.
Data collected with regards to crime can include:
- Geographical Patterns
- Geographical Locations
- Growth Patterns
- Associated Political structures etc.
Not only can these data be collected much more easily, they can also be processed at a much more faster rate.
<h3>What is the history of crime rates in America?</h3>
Crime rates have fluctuated throughout time, with a strong rise following 1900 and a broad bulging high during the 1970s and early 1990s.
According to FBI data, violent crime in the United States has decreased somewhat since 2016, falling from just under 400 events per 100,000 people that year to around 380 incidents per 100,000 people in 2019.
Learn more about Crime Response:
brainly.com/question/11096557
#SPJ1
