<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>
Potter's Historical Interpretations of the Civil War:
Students of history state that he had a lopsided scholarly history, since he offered a dimension of tolerance to the genius bondage philosophies that he doesn't grant to the abolitionist subjugation development. Abolitionists were everything from oppressive to helpful people, as per Potter.
Holt's Historical Interpretation of the Civil War:
Holt, then again, was a teacher so he given an increasingly clear translation of the Civil War, indeed, Holt sees the contention as a breakdown in America's majority rule political procedure. No longer contrasts must be settled inside the field of fight, as per him.
Answer:
senators and communist
Explanation:
its just the only answers in my view that make sense
Answer:
History surrounding the 27 Amendments to the United States (US) Constitution. ... for individual rights, Congress began to consider the idea of a "Bill of Rights. ... But most Ideas would go through a process to become ammendment
Explanation:
No, it is false that when you officially join a political party, you are making a lifelong commitment, since you can change your party affiliation at any time. In fact, you don't have to join any party at all.