It would prove to be extremely ineffective. When the United States decided not to join the league, it was primarily made up of weak countries so it didn't have any muscle to enforce anything. This was proven when Japan inbaded Manchuria despite the league trekking then not to. This showed Hitler that without the united States in the league of Nations, there would be nobody to step in and stop Germany from invading Poland in 1939
Answer:
Hispaniola
Explanation:
I just took the test and got it right
Hope this helps you :)
Answer:
They did so at the Colosseum in Rome
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
From the question and available options, it can be concluded that
1. The city with the largest population is "Tokyo-Yokohama" with a population of 37,239,000 people.
2. The city with a population of about twenty-seven million people is "Jakarta" with an actual population of 26,746,000 people.
3. The city that is the most crowded is "Delhi" with a population density (people per square mile) of 29,700 people/square mile.
No, I believe that multiple weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation would have hurt America in time. One of the biggest problems was the lack of detail and specific attributes that the Constitution brings from long discussion and debates over what is best for the country. America needed to strengthen it's central government if it wanted to get anywhere, so we may not have become so powerful if we left the majority of the power in the state's hands. Another lacking component was the fact that we had no Executive branch to enforce Congress' laws and no National court to determine the meaning of the laws. Another example is the making of one currency for the entire country. These examples and more could have hurt America if they wouldn't have written the Constitution.
