Answer:
Yes you are right
the reactions catalyzed by hexokinase, phosphofructokinase, and pyruvate kinase
Explanation:
CH4 Methane which is the prototypical organic molecule and the others are chemical not sure about water
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
I feel like it would be O.40 mol Mgo but I could be wrong
Answer:
science is nothing without funding
Explanation:
Well Science in the US is highly a political affair. Scientists need funding for research, so they usually have to obtain grants from people who have the means to spare it. In many cases that means people who are involved with the government, or have close ties to it.
So scientists find themselves having to play off partisan politics in order to secure the funding they need for their research. Many times they also find that their research will inevitably get skewn to meet the original funders own ends.
Mostly what I have said is commonly known. However I am in school, and deal with scientists and doctoral researchers who have expressed and validated similar experiences.