The answer to this question is the "resource mobilization theory" which is the third item from the choices. Sociologists who focus on how practical constraints and opportunities can help or hinder a social movement are using resource mobilization theory. They are discussing the idea that success depends on the availability of the resources such as time, money and skills and how to use these resources.
Answer: Because knowing the people who are part of the government allows them to know who is doing a good job for the nation and who is not.
Explanation:
Some people underestimate the importance of knowing who are the people who over the years are part of the presidential cabinet when in reality it should be the opposite. Every citizen must know the political history of his country so that in the future he will not repeat those disasters that at some time could lead the nation to its economic and social loss.
The government is responsible for the welfare of citizens. It is responsible for making decisions that contribute to the growth of the nation. When a ruler does not fulfill what was promised and only occupies positions for its benefit, citizens know that this type of person should not be the president of the nation. This helps them know who they should choose in the future.
Citizens are responsible for choosing who will be their rulers, so people must know the political and professional trajectory that future candidates have and thus be able to determine who will do a good job and who will not.
A town that does not stay informed tends to fail. Make bad decisions and then be sorry for what they have done. They blame the people in power, but forget that it was they who put those leaders in government.
Each of the leaders who have ruled a country marks a before and after. They leave changes in the country that can be both positive and negative, the people must follow up to think that it is in fact that it is convenient for them. Citizens must know all the steps that governments are taking since certain decisions can negatively influence the country and citizens are those who have to pay the consequences.
Explanation:
The Spanish and Mexican governments made many concessions and land grants in Alta California (now known as California) and Baja California from 1785 to 1846. The Spanish Concessions of land were made to retired soldiers as an inducement for them to remain in the frontier. These Concessions reverted to the Spanish crown upon the death of the recipient. The Mexican government later encouraged settlement by issuing much larger land grants to both native-born and naturalized Mexican citizens. The grants were usually two or more square leagues, or 35 square kilometres (14 sq mi) in size. Unlike Spanish Concessions, Mexican land grants provided permanent, unencumbered ownership rights. Most ranchos granted by Mexico were located along the California coast around San Francisco Bay, inland along the Sacramento River, and within the San Joaquin Valley.
When the government secularized the Mission churches in 1833, they required that land be set aside for each Neophyte family. But the Native Americans were quickly brushed aside by Californios who, with the help of those in power, acquired the church lands as grants. The indigenous peoples of the Americas ("Indians") instead became virtual slaves of the rancheros.
Spain made about 30 concessions between 1784 and 1821, and Mexico issued about 270 land grants between 1833 and 1846. The ranchos established permanent land-use patterns. The rancho boundaries became the basis for California's land survey system, and are found on modern maps and land titles. The "rancheros" (rancho owners) patterned themselves after the landed gentry of New Spain, and were primarily devoted to raising cattle and sheep. Their workers included Native Americans who had learned Spanish while living at one of the former Missions. The ranchos were often based on access to the resources necessary for raising cattle, such as grazing lands and water. Land development from that time forward has often followed the boundaries of the ranchos, and many of their names are still in use. For example, Rancho San Diego is now an unincorporated "rural-burb" east of San Diego, and Rancho Bernardo is a suburb in San Diego.
Answer:
B. special effects
Explanation:
In the 19th century, there were no computers of special camera to effect special effects, it is a 20th century development. Special effects was not influenced by 19th century visual culture. On the contrary, tableaux of key dramatic moments, indoor lighting systems, painted sets and props, participation of famous stage actors are part of 19th century visual culture that had an influence on the staging of early films.
