Answer:
Yes, different societies require different amounts of societal resources. Explanation:
The amounts of societal resources are based on the size or population of the society. The more vast the population the more resources needed. For example, the USA and Russia have a different population count, so that does mean we require different amounts of societal resources.
Answer:
$270,000
Explanation:
Data provided
Quantity of products = $280,000
Total fixed costs = $800,000
Unit sales price = $16
Variable cost = $12
The computation of units must be sold is shown below:-
Contribution per unit = $16 - $12
= $4 per unit
Units must be sold = (Quantity of products + Total fixed costs) ÷ Contribution per unit
= ($280,000 + $800,000) ÷ $4
= $1,080,000 ÷ $4
= $270,000
A conventional peg refers to when a country formally pegs its currency at a fixed rate to another currency or basket of currencies where the basket reflects the geographic distribution of trade, services, or capital flows.
for better understanding lets explain what conventional peg means
- conventional peg as related to when country formally (de jure) pinpoint their own currency at a fixed rate to the currency of another said country example is, from the currencies of major trading or financial partners and weights showing on the distribution of trade in different geographical zones
- The known backbone or anchor currency or basket weights are public or notified to the IMF and a country authorities are able to maintain the fixed parity through direct intervention
From the above, we can therefore say that the answer A conventional peg refers to when a country formally pegs its currency at a fixed rate to another currency or basket of currencies where the basket reflects the geographic distribution of trade, services, or capital flows is correct.
learn more about exchange rates from:
brainly.com/question/21384395
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
