I believe that civil disobedience can peacefully solve a
social injustice. Great historical figures like Martin Luther King Jr. and
Mahatma Gandhi used their own versions of civil disobedience to fight for
justice.
Civil disobedience has contributed to better leadership and peaceful co-existence around the world. Dr. Martin Luther Jr. once said that laws can be legal but unjust.
While thinking about those words, I realized that disobeying unjust laws can
be an effective way of bringing justice to those who deserve it.
Answer: Its during the night in an ancient, large, and frightening evil seeming dark house.
Explanation: Hope this helps!
To determine the result of something, or a scenario before it happens.
Answer:
"A Rose for Emily" is a successful story not only because of its intricately complex chronology, but also because of its unique narrative point of view. Most critics incorrectly consider the narrator, who uses "we" as though speaking for the entire town, to be young, impressionable, and male; however, on close examination, we realize that the narrator is not young and is never identified as being either male or female. The character of the narrator is better understood by examining the tone of the lines spoken by this "we" person, who changes his/her mind about Miss Emily at certain points in the narration.
Explanation:
can i have brainlest pls
Answer:
The one way mirror is a mirror for one and a window for the other side.
Explanation:
In <em>Through the looking glass</em> by the Washington Post, the author uses the one way mirror to describe the peculiar relation between the US and Canada.
For most Americans, i.e. United States citizens, Canada is an empty screen, for we either don´t know much of it or we are not interested. Or a mixture of both. Therefore the Americans are on the mirror side. We look at ourselves and can only imagine what is behind the mirror.
For the Canadians the mirror is a window that clearly shows how much the other side has influenced (economically, culturally) them. Of course the worldpower factor is decisive in the one way mirror comparison: The US, as the worldpower, cannot be bothered by taking neighbouring countries all too serious; Canada, on the other side, is submitted to play the small little brother that follows suit with everything big brother does.
