Answer:
cuvuvigigigigig88g8gigigig8fi
Answer:
No, Watching TV has an opportunity cost
Explanation:
Opportunity costs represent the forfeited benefits for preferring a certain option over others. It is the foregone benefits from the next best alternative.
Watching TV for two hours has an opportunity cost. By watching TV, a person has sacrificed doing other things. The two hours could have been used in other ways like working, studying, swimming, or playing. By watching TV, the person missed benefits from the other activities. The other activity that would have resulted in more benefits other than watching TV is the opportunity cost.
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": Cultural similarities.
Explanation:
Cultural similarities refer to customs and special terms that for one region or country are widely accepted but not for others. Those actions or phrases could be exactly the same but carry a different or even negative meaning in different places. This is not limited to actions and terms used in day-to-day activities but also under formal circumstances.
Answer:
The answer is: C) Consider his continued association with the client.
Explanation:
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) issues a professional conduct code that regulates their affiliates' activities. According to AICPA's Responsibilities and Public Interest principles, Sam should not continue to work with this client. Sam cannot maintain a professional conduct if he accepts that his client doesn't correct his prior mistakes. If those prior errors persist, then his job will be negatively affected and then it will his responsibility. Accounting is not something static that begins and ends in one period, past records affect present and future records.
