Answer:
By comparing the ratios of sides in similar triangles ΔABC and ΔADB,we can say that 
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that ∠ABC=∠ADC, AD=p and DC=q.
Let us take compare Δ ABC and Δ ADB in the attached file , ∠A is common in both triangles
and given ∠ABC=∠ADB=90°
Hence using AA postulate, ΔABC ≈ ΔADB.
Now we will equate respective side ratios in both triangles.

Since we don't know BD , BC let us take first equality and plugin the variables given in respective sides.

Cross multiply

Hence proved.
A common misconception in statistics is confusing correlation with causation. If two events are correlated, it merely means that they share the same behaviour over time, but it doesn't imply in any way that those event are related by a common cause, or even worse, that one implies the other.
You can find several (even humorous) counter examples online. For example, if you plot the number of reported pirates assault against the global temperature in the last years, you'll se that temperature is rising (unfortunately...) while pirates are almost disappearing.
One could observe this strong negative correlation and claim that hotter climate has solved the pirate issue. Of course this is a joke, but it explains why you shouldn't confuse correlation with causation.
Answer:
There would be 473 turnips.
Step-by-step explanation:
The probability of 1 number showing up out of 20 is 1/20
The probability of 3 different numbers showing up would be 3/20
Answer: 3/20
Answer:
C. Multiply both 2and 4 into it then you'll have the answer