2/3 = 8/12
5 1/4 = 21/4 = 63/12
63 divide by 8 is 7.875
7 batches should be your answer
hope this helps
Answer:
There are no x-intercepts.
Step-by-step explanation:
To find an x intercept we have to find where y = 0
So set the equation equal to zero
Since the number under the radical is negative, we know there are no real solutions, and therefore there are no x-intercepts.
This is shown on the graph.
<em>Greetings from Brasil...</em>
G = {4; 8; 12; 16; 20; 24; 28; 32; 36; 40; 44; 48; 52; 56; 60; 64; 68; 72; 76; 80; 84; 88; 92; 96; 100; 104; ...}
F = {1; 4; 9; 16; 25; 36; 49; 64; 81; 100; ...}
So, according to the statement, it is desired:
G ∩ F - the intersection between the 2 sets, that is, which numbers are present simultaneously in the 2 sets....
Looking at the sets we conclude that
<h2>G ∩ F = {4; 16; 36; 64; 100}</h2><h2 /><h2 />
<em>OBS: note that in truth G are the multiples of 4</em>
2m=x
2for tables washed
For minutes
X for total tables washed
