PLEASE HELP A solo photographer has no need to collaborate. True False

2 answers:

6 0

Both true and false. If the photographer is good at working alone they would tend not to collaborate. But if they aren't they would want to collaborate to get better each day or to not getting better at all. But if they wanted to get more expirenced then they would most likely go for collaborating with other photographs both better and worse than themselves

konstantin123 [22]3 years ago

4 0

True if the photographer is good enough to do the work by himself.
But false if the photographer need something to teach him/her

You might be interested in

Does anyone want to play a kahoot on LGBTQIA+ history? :)))

Alecsey [184]

sure whats the code?

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following could be a 5-line rhyming poem about a dancer?

sertanlavr [38]

Answer: LIMERICK

Explanation: IT S FIVE LINE PROCCES

8 0

2 years ago

Which table represents a proportional relationship?

iragen [17]

3 because they all share something in common. 2*3 is 6, 6*3 is 18, so on and so forth

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The greatest painting you can look at is the sky full of stars..<br>can you able to see them ..

Semenov [28]

Answer:

I am can able to see them

Explanation:

Im not THAT blind

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Conceptual artists frequently produce works of art that are deliberately uninteresting to look at because

AlladinOne [14]

The conceptual artists produced works of art that are deliberately uninteresting because art objects are not as important as artistic ideas.

<h3>Who are conceptual artists?</h3>

These are artist that held the idea that the work is more important than the finished art object or aesthetic concerns.

Hence, most times, these artists produced works of art that are deliberately uninteresting because art objects are not as important as artistic ideas.