Answer:
I am pretty sure it would be the second one.
Explanation:
I think this because the title of the paragraph is "Life Without Gravity" would mean to live without gravity, and the second one is talking about astronauts living without gravity.
Answer:
<u>STARTING LINE</u>
My most memoriable trip was to Pakistan, this was because i had never experienced being in a unique surrounding filled with so much happiness, joy and excitement ......
....
<u>THEN U CAN TALK ABOUT THE PEOPLE AND ENVIRONMENT WHICH HELPED MAKE</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>T A MEMORIABLE EXPERIENCE</u>
The people there are so humble and caring and welcomed me with happiness, they were also very content as they were grateful for many things which people here where i live would genrally complain about etc.
<u>U CAN TALK ABOUT UR JOURNEY TOWARDS THE LOCATION AND LINK IT WITH WHY IT WAS MEMORIABLE</u>
I was nervous for the journey going to Pakistan as i had never been in a plane before.
As i gazed out of the window towards the beautiful scenary i .......(u can finish the sentence)
<u>ENDING</u>
This was my most memoriable experience as i had never been to any other country before and i had such an outstanding experience, i would love to go again.....
.......
Explanation:
Here r a few points u could add or consider
It's best if u add more bits to it to make it more descriptive but this was to help u get an idea of what to write.
Based on my experience btw :)
hope it helped
We as people speak different languages in different parts of the world. The different languages which we speak are all unique in its own way some way or the other . This entry will contain more in depth information about various languages and also how learning new languages may influence cognition.
Every language is having a set of principles as well as patterns which help people follow a guideline while learning a particular language.Another important factor about languages is following the syntax. The syntax is a set of rules which organizes a sentence in a sequence.However, the syntax may vary for different languages . For example the syntax for the French language and syntax for the English language are different.Benjamin Worf believed that language made our thoughts shape in a certain manner he called it linguistic relativity. He spoke about how there were even differences in languages while describing a certain event. For example while describing a event in the English language you mention the name of the doer ("Donald made a mistake") rather then just saying mistakes were made. Whereas if you are speaking in a Spanish or Japanese language they prefer to not use the name of the doer while describing an incident or event.
In this case of the German word one may say that Language does have quite an effect on cognition . This is because some of the habits which we are acquiring through our language is irreversible as per Worf's theory. This means that your thinking pattern will remain the same , as when you learned the language at first. For instance, a speaker whose native language is Japanese will stick with the traditional ideas associated with the Japanese language. On the other hand a native speaker of the English language would stick with traditional ideas of the English Language.
A reasonable point which could be made is that language is leading us to a path of what we are paying attention to , and it is believed that it is attention which is actually playing a role in influencing Cognition and not language .Its crucial to understand that when it comes to attention there maybe certain criteria involved and this criteria may reduce the influence of language.This proves that , yes language has a pretty relevant impact on cognition but it is certainly not irreversible as Whorf''s Theory. Another important aspect to understand here is that it is your experience which is influencing your way of thinking , and your way of thinking depends on what you are paying attention to.
Answer:
Not all of the writer’s evidence is relevant to her argument, though. In defending the movie version of the book, she cites reviewer Peter Rainer:
Reviewers have offered equally high praise for the movie. Film critic Peter Rainer notes in his online movie review for the ?Christian Science Monitor,? “the great conundrum of the Holocaust is that it was perpetrated by human beings, not monsters. Few movies have rendered this puzzle so powerfully.” (Rainer, November 8, 2008) It is interesting to note that Rainer has also reviewed Richard Linklater’s ? Boyhood.? ?Boyhood ? is another child-centered movie. (Rainer, July 11, 2014)
Rainer’s comments about the strength of the movie are relevant. But the fact that Rainer has reviewed other child-centered movies adds nothing to the claim the writer is trying to support.
No writer is entirely wrong or entirely right. By applying critical analysis to the full text of a persuasive selection, readers can evaluate the persuasiveness of the arguments. Reading critically is essential for readers who want to navigate their way through published opinions, editorials, blog posts, theater and movie reviews, or any other persuasive texts. First, identify the writer’s claim. Second, examine the supporting evidence for relevance and reliability. Finally, decide whether or not the writer has argued for his or her claim persuasively
there's not a lot of information given, but my guess is:
Poets set tone, and evoke mood.
The tone is the poet's attitude towards their writing, while the mood is the atmosphere received by the reader.
