The Sherman Act is a federal statute, enacted in 1890, that makes certain restraints of trade and monopolistic acts illegal.
Legal ones are generally permitted by law. Illegal, on the other hand, means that something is not permitted by law. In English there are several ways to do the opposite.
Not all illegal acts are criminal acts, but all acts that are considered criminal are always illegal acts. For example, exceeding the speed limit is illegal, but not criminal.
Driving It is illegal to drive without a US driver's license. It is illegal to enter or ride a vehicle without wearing a seatbelt. It is illegal for an infant to ride in a car without a child seat. 8 Drugs It is illegal to buy, sell or use drugs.
Learn more about illegal here:brainly.com/question/5993449
#SPJ4
No picture and it wont let me copy and paste so try posting the picture again
Answer:
Mao’s revolution
Explanation:
in 1911 Qing dynasty came to an end but
if someone besides Mao had come to power
much of the feudal & agarian system would have stayed in place
mao changed that
ended the feudal land system where many people were subordinated to the landlords
he also changed china from an agarian country to an industrial one
he helped china become a global military power by allying itself with the soviet union , entering the korean war, being one of 5 countries in the UN security council in 1971, and allying itself with the US
Answer:
no there are but in the mid 20 century but in the 21 century women are given work better work than men so i can say that women and men are on the same coin
Answer:
The correct answer is d) Under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.
Explanation:
During the year of 1787, there was a dispute in States
United where two groups were formed, the federalists and the anti-federalists.
The federalists were people who fought for the last modification of the constitution to be validated; instead, the antifederalists they fought so that these changes were not made.
The group that agreed with the change in the constitution believed that having a unified government would give them more control with the people and businesses that were important to them. On the other hand, the antifederalist considered that having a centralized government would cause people to lose their freedom and found it a repressive act before the citizens.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
