Why is Mrs. Williams clearly the guilty
party in the case?
<span>She
is married, though she is not wearing her wedding ring. Too, when the detective is questioning the
painter and cleaning lady about the blue paint used to deface the painting,
Mrs. Williams is seen biting the nails on her left hand—the hand where her
wedding ring should be. It can be
assumed that Mrs. Williams is not wearing her wedding because she got paint on
it, and she is biting her nails to remove the evidence of the blue paint that
may have been on and/or under her nails in order to remove the evidence the way
she might have done by removing a potentially paint-stained wedding ring.</span>
What motivated her to ruin the Wyeth
painting?
<span>Mrs.
Williams is angry with her husband by the way her husband treats Mrs. Williams’
family—his in-laws. In order to get back
at her husband, she for treating what she loves badly, she ruined something he
loves—fine art.</span>
<span>One of the most oppressive physical elements about Esperanza's situation that she reacts to is actually the poverty that she and her family faces, and the way that this traps them in their house which Esperanza feels so ashamed of and also gives Esperanza such an intense desire to improve herself and study so that she can escape and buy her own house.</span>
Answer:
50 POINTS!
Annotate the text by competing statement in the table.
As I read a question I have is
A text-to-self connection I can make is
A text-to-text connection I can make is
A text-to-world connection I can make is
An inference I can make is
My inference is supported by this evidence from the text:
I used the comprehension strategy , which helped me
After reading the text, a question I have is
incomplete questions
She is comparing since she is looking at the different boxes and comparing the grams of sugar
