The answer is “he states that it spread from the middle east” , because first he talks about florence, italy :)
<span>Dr. King explains that he has read the recent statement published by clergymen in a Birmingham newspaper, describing Dr. King’s recent activities in the city as “unwise and untimely.” Though he does not usually respond to criticisms – he receives far too many for that to be practical – he believes these men are “of genuine good will” and hence do their criticisms deserve an answer (169).He first acknowledges the criticism that he is one of many “outsiders coming in” to cause trouble (their words). He explains his purpose: he is the president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), based in Atlanta but operating throughout the South. He describes the extent of the organization’s reach, and then explains that one of its affiliates in Birmingham had invited the SCLC to “engage in a nonviolent direct-action program” when racial issues grew difficult there. The SCLC answered the call, and hence does Dr. King insist that “I, along with several members of my staff, am here because I was invited here” (170).</span>
hope this helps!
Answer:
1. Individual states' rights
2. Low tariffs
3. Secession
Explanation:
1. The Confederacy felt that each state should have the right to create their own laws and regulations. They felt that the federal government was too strong and was acting unfairly towards the southern states.
2. The South produced many crops such as cotton, sugar, rice, and tobacco. Foreign trade was crucial to the southern economy, so they favored low tariffs to keep foriegn goods cheap and to foster trade with other countries.
3. The Confederacy felt that it had the right to secede, or leave, the United States to form their own nation. They felt that the northern states had treated them unfairly by their imposition of high tariffs and opposition to slavery, therefore, it was time to create their own country.
One serving of hot fries has 0.5 grame
<span>Cesare Beccaria believed that swift and timely punishment would have greater influence on people's motivation to obey laws. He believed the punishment should be equal to the harm done as in an eye for an eye. Though oddly he disagreed with the death penalty.</span>
