An ellipsis (plural: ellipses) is a punctuation mark consisting of three dots. Use an ellipsis when omitting a word, phrase, line, paragraph, or more from a quoted passage. Ellipses save space or remove material that is less relevant. ... Although ellipses are used in many ways, the three-dot method is the simplest.
Hey there!
The most common belief for why he did this was to promote originality. Most poets in that time used rhyming meters, and they still do today. In fact, you were probably taught rhyming meters in school - they follow rhythm and pattern that isn't subject to change.
Robert Frost wanted to break the rules. Considering the nonexistent popularity of the style he intended to use, he created an entire new type of poetry and writing by breaking the rules themselves. There was no rhyme, but there certainly was reason.
Hope this helps!
Celebration? In not sure but wouldnt you celebrate all of these?
Students are prepared for discussion when they show arguments about the play, justified with evidence present in the play.
Daniela can justify her view of Mrs. Stevenson by showing the moments in the play when Mrs. Stevenson behaves like a tense person, lacking calmness.
Unfortunately, it's not possible to access the students' discussion, as I can't see the clip of that discussion. This prevents me from giving you a specific answer, but I will help you as best I can.
When the discussion about a text will be established among a group of students. These students must prepare themselves before the discussion can be established. This preparation takes place as follows:
- Students should read the entire text and reread it if necessary.
- They must understand all the aspects that the text presents and the message that the text wants to convey.
- They must form arguments about the text, which are opinions they have about the plot, themes, and characters.
- They must confirm these arguments, justifying them with evidence, that is, parts of the text that confirm that the argument is correct.
In this case, when prepared, the students can talk about the text and keep the discussion fluid and active, allowing different arguments to be presented.
You can have more information at the link below:
brainly.com/question/22580772?referrer=searchResults
<span>The question given above is incomplete, the options are not given. The options attached to the question are written below:
A. It was her sister Josephine who told her, in broken sentences; veiled hints that revealed in half concealing. Her husband's friend Richards was there, too, near her. It was he who had been in the newspaper office when intelligence of the railroad disaster was received, with Brently Mallard's name leading the list of "killed." He had only taken the time to assure himself of its truth by a second telegram, and had hastened to forestall any less careful, less tender friend in bearing the sad message.
B. She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance. She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister's arms. When the storm of grief had spent itself she went away to her room alone. She would have no one follow her.
C. There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature. A kind intention or a cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination.
D. Some one was opening the front door with a latchkey. It was Brently Mallard who entered, a little travel-stained, composedly carrying his grip-sack and umbrella. He had been far from the scene of the accident, and did not even know there had been one. He stood amazed at Josephine's piercing cry; at Richards' quick motion to screen him from the view of his wife.
ANSWER
The correct option is C.
The statement given in option C explains the new situation in which Mallard's wife find herself after she was told that her husband was involved in a train accident. It is obvious that she had been living for her husband before now and he was the one that was in full control of her will, she was totally dependent on him. But now, she has just gain back her freedom and she is now free to follow the dictates of her own heart and will and not that of someone else. That is true independence.</span>
