Answer:
The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.
Explanation:
Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.
Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.
Answer:
$735,000
Explanation:
The fair values of the assets may be used as a basis for determining the amount to be recorded for each of the assets.
This will be in a proportional manner such that the higher the fair value, the higher the actual cost assigned and vice versa to the asset.
Hence the amount to be recorded for the building
= 840,000 / (840,000 + 840,000 + 1,120,000) * $2,450,000
= $735,000
Answer:
A) right; increase
Explanation:
In the case of the closed economy when the marginal product of capital increased so it also increased the investment due to which the shifting of the investment curve is rightward and this will result in increase in the real interest rate
So as per the given situation, the option a is correct
