Based on drug potency, the IC50 level of ART-S strain is much lower than the ART-R strain.
<h3>What is IC50?</h3>
IC50 is the half maximun inbitory concentration of a substance.
It is a measure of the potency of a drug or substance in inhibiting a specific biological or biochemical function.
The lower the IC50 value, the more potent the drug or substance is.
ART-S strain and ART-R strain refers to strains of Plasmodium that are sensitive and resistant respectively to artesunate treatment.
Therefore, the IC50 level of ART-S strain is much lower than the ART-R strain.
Learn more about drug potency at: brainly.com/question/1567485
Answer:
Historians have identified several causes that led to the outbreak of the Cold War, including: tensions between the two nations at the end of World War II, the ideological conflict between both the United States and the Soviet Union, the emergence of nuclear weapons, and the fear of communism in the United States.
History is a social science that studies past social and political events. As a discipline, it uses a methodology in order to study historical facts. Facts are objective for every Historian, but when Historians interpret the same facts often they arrive at different conclusions. That is because interpretation is highly subjective and the only way to interpret facts is through some specific perspective, a point of view or paradigm. When Historians interpret some period of History using a theoretical framework, they look at History like looking through glasses that enhance some factors in detriment of others. And that is inevitable when doing the historical interpretation.
Take, for example, Vladimir Lenin and the rise of the Soviet Union. According to Marxism, it was the forces of a social class, the workers, that rose against the imperial Russian state and the bourgeoisie that led to the creation of a Communist state. There are several historical documents that back this point of view. But according to Intentionalism, it was the powerful and attractive personality of Lenin and his talent for politics which led to the fall of the empire and the establishment of a new political system. Again, this is also very well-documented.
Of course, there can also be many other interpretations for this fact. For any historical event, there are many alternate interpretations, each of which looks at different -and many times contradicting- factors of History.
Gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg
English and French Kingdoms had both similarities and differences, during the late 1600's.
Both had a monarchical system, with a king ruling the country.
However, France had been under the rule of Louis XIV for over 60 years by the end of the 17th century, thus, he had consolidated his power, and the crown's power above everything. He eliminated the remnants of feudalism still left across France and imposed a rule of absolute monarchy.
In contrast to the English kingdom, where the parliament was powerful enough to denounce King James II for abuse of power through the use of the Bill of Rights, and was a solid institution with the authority to depose the king if needed. The English kingdom had clear limits on the Crown's power and authority, and several tax and civil right laws could not be emitted without the Parliaments permission.
