Answer:
The star can overhelm the film.
Explanation:
The star in a film can be a risky move.
People can remember a star from another film and can remember a star as that character. The new film can be in the problem of that. If someone is remembered as a person who acts only people who died in a movie, the viewers can accept that as a fact. For example, John Hurt died in more than 40 movies, so the viewers could predict the destiny of his character.
There are not every star in this position, sometimes director or film can make the best choice for stars role and makes a role for the star in which he or she can shine but not to overhelm the film.
A. The phrase "tattered and fragile" modifies the word <em>book</em>.
B. It was an awesome party. Thanks for coming, man. It is been utilized informally to call the person, "man".
<h3>What is casual tone?</h3>
The audience for a casual tone of voice exists practically anybody. It is usually adjusted to the age group and society for whom the message or content is intended. It usually gives a pun or a joke, as if there exists a friendly conversation going on the highway corner or by the office coffee machine.
The casual style manages to accommodate the culture of the speaker in communication so it will be comfortable to be understood. Students also can utilize the utterances in their daily vitality because most of the utterances exist familiar to them.
The casual speech style exists as a style of speaking that stands warm, friendly, easygoing, informal, and often uses slang. In casual communication, the speaker exists satisfied and at ease. The listener is concentrated on the speaker's message rather than how they communicate it.
Hence, B. It was an awesome party. Thanks for coming, man. It is been utilized informally to call the person, "man".
To learn more about casual tone refer to:
brainly.com/question/10021265
#SPJ4
Well On Writing is about Stephen Kings Life as a writer and serves as a book that guides people who would like to indulge in writing themselves. Edgar Allan Poe's book The Philosophy of Composition is about how good writers write and kind of gives a brief synopsis about how a good writer should write. So therefore I believe they both address, Writers craft, or how a write should write!
Answer:
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>l</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>3</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>b</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>c</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>y</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>p</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>u</u></em><em><u>f</u></em><em><u>f</u></em>