To be completely honest with you I really don’t know
Answer:
C. “They are just the latest development in the long history of money.”
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that are missing from this question:
A. “It first appeared in 2009.”
B. “In mid-2018, one bitcoin was worth $6,100.”
C. “They are just the latest development in the long history of money.”
D. “Bitcoin is the most widely used cryptocurrency today.”
In the text, the author describes the way Bitcoin has grown and developed throughout the last ten years. Although the rise of Bitcoin suggests that the currency is extremely successful and popular, the author also tells us that Bitcoin is in reality the last example of a long list of developments in the history of money. When we analyze it in this way, we can assume that Bitcoin might not be as significant as we might be inclined to believe initially. This can lead us to believe that Bitcoin is unlikely to be a form of currency used by young people any time soon.
The author presents characteristics of Guyana's desolate and dismal landscape as a means to appeal to those who depended on the sugar production business in order to maintain themselves economically, and thus, demonstrating the importance of sugar. The whole purpose of the passage is to provide ethical evidence from the sugar scheme's current situation, presenting information about the moral consequences of this business' downfall; in this case, the economic backlash in the country of Guyana.
Answer:
Slavery was the main issue dividing the main parties.
Explanation:
The election of 1856 in which James Buchanan won as a Democratic presidential candidate, against the Know-Nothings party and the Republican party, shows that "Slavery was the main issue dividing the main parties."
This is evident in the fact that the Democratic party was perceived by the public as a party in support of slavery.
Hence, some Democrats and Whigs party members fall out to form new parties, the Know-Nothing Party, and the Republican party.
The Know-Nothings party has the ideal of anti-immigration, while the Republicans have the anti-slavery ideals.
