Answer:
C: Prices and output would rise, and the equilibrium will change
Explanation:
The more firms get from obligation as opposed to issuing stocks, the more it can diminish the aggregate cost of capital in light of the fact that the enthusiasm from obligation is duty deductible which will help reduce the aggregate cost of capital. In any case, no firm can get from obligation everlastingly in light of the fact that, at one point in time, extra obligation financing will make the aggregate cost of capital increment rather than decline. So firms will get in view of their own enhanced capital structure to limit the aggregate cost of capital however much as could reasonably be expected. Also, in light of this upgraded capital structure, there is a point of confinement to how much a firm can keep getting from obligation.
Answer:
A. higher
Explanation:
Fama And French did the risk factor study on stock, which clearly stated that when there is a high dividend yield then the stocks would perform good even in the market.
thus, this clearly reflects that when the market is high for stock returns then the dividend yield is also high.
This is basically the proportional reaction, as when the stock return is higher whether in terms of value addition or cash returns then only the dividend return would also be higher.
Correct option in this case will be:
A. Higher.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
An investment that "promises" a 44 percent annual return is most likely a scam, because even the riskiest stocks rarely yield annual returns higher than 10% of the initial investment.
Besides, the option is described as very complicated, and you as a potential investor do not understand it well, which is a very difficult position to be in because it could even lead you to being scammed without realizing.
