Answer:
Foley will probably win because he didn't do anything wrong, and he had an implied employment contract with Interactive that stated that he could be fired only after a seven step pre-termination procedure. The handbook guidelines that were given to Foley represent the implied contract, and management assured him that that his performance was adequate.
Answer: Yes, because the ETF is worth more than his original investment
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, the average inflation for next 20 years = 3.50%
Amount invested by John = $25,000
Then, the amount in 20 years after the adjustment of inflation will be:
= Amount invested (1+inflation rate)^n
= 25000(1+0.035)^20
= 25000(1.035)^20
= 25000 × 1.9898
= $49745
In this case, the answer is Yes due to the fact that the ETF is worth more than his original investment.
Answer:
Small macro disturbances can lead to much larger macro problems.
Explanation:
The Keynesian analysis depends entirely on demand. It is a simple analysis that shows that if a firm produces something and firm tries to price that product. it brings changes in gross demand directly and effects into converts GDP.
So we can say that even small disturbances can lead to big problems.
Answer:
generates positive cash flows over and above its internal requirements, thus providing a corporate parent with cash flows that can be used for financing new acquisitions, investing in cash hog businesses, funding share buyback programs, and/or paying dividends.
Explanation:
In Economics, a cash cow business produces large internal cash flows over and above what is needed to build and maintain the business. On the other hand, the internal cash flows of a cash hog business are too small to fully fund its operating needs and capital requirements.
Hence, a cash cow type of business generates positive cash flows over and above its internal requirements, thus providing a corporate parent with cash flows that can be used for financing new acquisitions, investing in cash hog businesses, funding share buyback programs, and/or paying dividends. Some examples of cash cow businesses are coca-cola, kellogg's corn flakes, Apple's iPhone, Microsoft Windows, Ford trucks, etc.
This is known as in-sample forecast. It estimated the model using all available data and then comparing it to the model's fixed values to the actual realizations. But, this method is known to attract an overly positive picture of the model's forecasting ability since common fitting algorithms tend to take pains to avoid big prediction errors and are also inclined to overfitting (mistaking noise for signal in the data).
