Answer:
The Battle of Marathon was significant because it proved to the Greeks that the Persians were not 'invincible', which boosted the moral of the Greek troops, increasing their confidence to incline themselves in a common cause if the Persian attacked again (which they would)
Explanation:
Adam Smith (1723 – 1790) was a Scottish economist. In 1776, he published The Wealth of Nations, which became the foundation of modern economics.
Smith saw the first duty of government was to protect the nation from invasion. Next, he supported an independent court system and administration of justice to control crime and protect property. Finally Smith favoured a system of “public works” that profits-seeking individuals may not be able to efficiently build and operate.
At the beginning stages of industrialization, Smith recognized that repetitive factory jobs dulled the minds o workers. Smith wanted all classes, even the poorest, to benefit from the free-market system. This is why I think Adam Smith would agree with government interventions with businesspeople like Social Security, minimum-wage laws, child-labour laws and anti-monopoly laws.
Answer: All of southern Mesopotamia as well as parts of Syria, Anatolia, and Elam (western Iran)
Explanation:
Sargon, by name Sargon of Akkad, (flourished 23rd century BCE), ancient Mesopotamian ruler (reigned c. 2334–2279 BCE) who was one of the earliest of the world's great empire builders, conquering all of southern Mesopotamia.
Answer:
c. put wage and price controls in place ended the gold standard and increased federal spending
Explanation:
Following the Kennedy-Johnson organization in the United States, there was a gigantic exertion to deal with the commercial center, to some extent by controlling wages. This action was not the handicraft of left-wing dissidents but rather of the organization of Richard Nixon, a decently moderate Republican who was a commentator of government intervention in the economy.
As a young fellow amid World War II, preceding joining the naval force, Nixon had filled in as a lesser lawyer in the tire-apportioning division of the Office of Price Administration, an encounter that left him with a lasting distaste for price controls.
The cost of gold had been fixed at $35 an ounce since the Roosevelt organization. Be that as it may, the developing U.S. balance-of-installments shortage implied that remote governments were gathering a lot of dollars - in total volume far surpassing the U.S. government's supply of gold. These legislatures, or their national banks, could appear whenever at the "gold window" of the U.S. Treasury and demand exchanging their dollars for gold, which would accelerate a run. The issue was not hypothetical. In the second seven day stretch of August 1971, the British envoy turned up at the Treasury Department to demand that $3 billion be changed over into gold.
The u.s has more money and such stuff like that i dont have a clear view of what you said!
