Who's perspective do you think this is from?
that can be a good question
Answer:
The rapid increase in the colonial population in the 1600s/17th century was due to indentured servants, religious freedom found in the colonies, and the slave trade.
Explanation:
The rapid increase in the colonial population in the 1600s/17th century was due to indentured servants, religious freedom found in the colonies, and the slave trade. A lot of people in Europe (especially Britain), were seeking a better life whether it was to come over to escape paying their taxes/debt to the crown or to start a new life and they became an indentured servant. Back then, it was almost impossible to move to an upper class so many young people in their early 20s (mostly men, but some young women) took the voyage over to the New World to have a better life where after around seven years of working, they got freedom and some land that they could start a life for themselves. Some people, such as the Puritans, Pilgrims, and others were wanting to come to America to escape the religious persecution that was going on over in Britain where the Church of England (Anglian) was being practiced and it was separated from the Catholic church but it still had many Catholic practices and the puritans wanted to “purify” the church so they moved over to live out their new religion. A lot of Africans were also brought over from the slave trade to grow the new crops such as tobacco and work in the plantations in the South.
Generally speaking, reading a series of proverbs has affected people of certain faiths in that it inspires them--often in ways that allow them to lead better or more fulfilling lives.
one who believes in atonement
Option B.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Crusaders were the people who wanted to bring about a change in the fields and areas of religion, political change and social change. They wanted to participate in the crusade for atoning for their sins and the wrong done by them.
Thus these were the people who believed in atonement, they believed that they could make up, do reparation for the wrong done by participating in the war of crusades.
Answer:
Sparta was not quite the same as Athens in pretty much every manner, starting with its government. While Athens was a majority rule system, Sparta was a theocracy. In a government, the decision power is in the possession of a couple of individuals. Sparta's administration-just as Spartan culture-was committed to military strength. One of the primary ways they were comparative was in their type of government. Both Athens and Sparta had to get together, whose individuals were chosen by the people. Sparta was managed by two lords, who controlled until they passed on or were constrained out of office. Athens was controlled by archons, who were chosen yearly.
Explanation:
hope this helps
