For the answer to the question above, is your question just asking for an opinion? Well, this is my answer to that, I believe it is <span>Griswold. Nash only made one point and it was from his own opinion. Griswold had facts and stuck to them.
I hope my answer helped you</span>
Answer: A . It allows the reader to understand the reason behind the narrator’s actions
Explanation: hope this helps
Answer:
esdfhjytdryfjchgghgv
Explanation:
fxgchvjbkhcggjnvfhvjgmhbhjg
Answer:
There were many facts that hinted that dragons may not be fictional.
Explanation:
The three details from the texts that supports the main idea are:
1) People of different cultures describe dragons in similar ways. Each culture serve as witnesses to other cultures testimonies regarding dragons.
2) Dragons are mentioned not only in stories but also in old legal papers, in the travel logs of Marco Polo, and in the Bible.
3) Dragons are included along with eleven real animals in the Chinese calendar.
