Answer:
Post-1945 immigration to the United States differed fairly dramatically from America’s earlier 20th- and 19th-century immigration patterns, most notably in the dramatic rise in numbers of immigrants from Asia. Beginning in the late 19th century, the U.S. government took steps to bar immigration from Asia. The establishment of the national origins quota system in the 1924 Immigration Act narrowed the entryway for eastern and central Europeans, making western Europe the dominant source of immigrants. These policies shaped the racial and ethnic profile of the American population before 1945. Signs of change began to occur during and after World War II. The recruitment of temporary agricultural workers from Mexico led to an influx of Mexicans, and the repeal of Asian exclusion laws opened the door for Asian immigrants. Responding to complex international politics during the Cold War, the United States also formulated a series of refugee policies, admitting refugees from Europe, the western hemisphere, and later Southeast Asia. The movement of people to the United States increased drastically after 1965, when immigration reform ended the national origins quota system. The intricate and intriguing history of U.S. immigration after 1945 thus demonstrates how the United States related to a fast-changing world, its less restrictive immigration policies increasing the fluidity of the American population, with a substantial impact on American identity and domestic policy.
Explanation:
Nepal...............................................................................
Answer:
D | The option 'put a higher tax on sugar' was not part of the Intolerable Acts.
Explanation:
The Intolerable Acts was not included with the Sugar Act.
Therefore, the Sugar Act put a higher tax on sugar while the Intolerable Acts did not.
Answer:
The antitrust laws proscribe unlawful mergers and business practices in general terms, leaving courts to decide which ones are illegal based on the facts of each case. Courts have applied the antitrust laws to changing markets, from a time of horse and buggies to the present digital age.
Explanation:
In Lincoln's view, a union victory and the change of lifestyle in US would mean that the sacrifice has not gone in vain.
Explanation:
For Lincoln, those who died in Gettysburg died for a new and more free US.
This is as such, the reason that they must achieve those ideals and work towards achieving those ideals even harder.
Not only is it important to win the war for the union and keep US united and free the slaves, It is also about living a life more equal
He knew that this would have re defined the nation as a whole and he wanted to ascertain that would in fact happen,
