1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mama L [17]
3 years ago
11

Why do plaintiffs sometimes reach settlements before a civil trial begins?

Law
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Choice D)  To make sure they get at least part of what they want

=============================================================

Explanation:

Let's go through the answer choices to see which are true and which are false.

  • A) False. The plaintiff is the one doing the prosecution or bringing the case against the defendant. The plaintiff is not on trial.
  • B) False. For many cases, a judge isn't involve in the settlement process. In those cases, the two parties directly negotiate together to settle the dispute. In cases where a judge is involved with a settlement, their powers aren't as strong as compared to a courtroom setting.
  • C) False. Again, the plaintiff isn't the one being accused of the crime. That would be the defendant.
  • D) True. Court cases take a very long time to reach their conclusion. Not only that, they're very costly as well (in terms of money, time and resources). Not to mention the stress they bring about also. All of these factors sometimes lead people to go for a settlement even if they know they have a 100% airtight case against their opponent. Settlements are often the easier route and they allow people to get something rather than nothing. Keep in mind that even if there is an airtight case, there might be some technicality that allows to defendant to be found not guilty.
You might be interested in
Briefly describe the crime that was committed in the Bay Harbor Pool Room.
arlik [135]

Answer:

1. What happened on June 3, 1961 at the Bay Harbor Pool Hall in Panama City, Florida? The owner found a window broken, a few bottles of wine missing, the cigarette machine and jukebox smashed, and a small amount of change stolen from the machines.

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
__________________________________: statues that protect rescuers from being sued for giving emergency care
joja [24]

Good Samaritan laws statues that protect rescuers from being sued for giving emergency care.

<h3>What is the Good Samaritan law?</h3>

Good Samaritan laws is known to be a  law that gives legal protection to individuals that are in need of assistance especially to those who are seen to be injured, ill, in peril, etc.

Therefore, Good Samaritan laws statues that protect rescuers from being sued for giving emergency care.

Learn more about Good Samaritan laws  from

brainly.com/question/22477589

#SPJ12

7 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
El producto final despues de aplicar todo el instructivo. ¿es una manualida? ¿porque?​
Alina [70]

La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.

Desafortunadamente, tu pregunta está incompleta. No incluyes ninguna referencia de lo que se trata. No aportas ningún contexto, lectura, ejemplo, texto para poder relacionar tu pregunta.

Sin embargo, tratando de ayudarte hicimos una investigación profunda y encontramos un texto donde se pide algo similar a lo que estás preguntando.

Así que podemos comentarte lo siguiente,

El producto final, después de aplicar todo el instructivo, sí puede ser considerado una manualidad porque ha utilizado los materiales que se sugieren para obtener el resultado final y se ha elaborado de una manera artesanal -es decir.no profesional utilizando los materiales que se pueden conseguir en casa.

Se le considera trabajo manual porque se usaron elementos caseros, sencillos, y se siguieron las instrucciones para que sin ser un experto, consiguieras armar tu creación que fue el teléfono portátil usando vasos desechables, hilo y tijeras.

8 0
3 years ago
Difference between confidentiality and privacy
attashe74 [19]

Answer:

Main Differences Between Privacy vs Confidentiality

Privacy

The ability to keep one’s life and perso ...

Applies to individuals

Personal choice

A human right backed up the government

vs

Confidential

Applies to information

Professional obligation

An agreement between two or more parties

A piece of personal information shared

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What are the four types of evidence in a criminal investigation? Please briefly explain<br> each.
    11·1 answer
  • Resolve this issue?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the LAW OF BLOOD
    6·1 answer
  • Define stationhouse ​
    13·2 answers
  • Is an amount of money paid to the court to ensure that the defendant
    5·2 answers
  • bình luận tại sao kinh doanh dịch vụ đòi nợ được coi là một loại hình thức kinh doanh dịch vụ hợp pháp trong luật đầu tư 2014
    7·1 answer
  • Name one way that you can participate in the voting process even though you can’t vote
    15·1 answer
  • Do you think the benefits of transitioning from coded talk, specifically 10-codes, to plain language communication outweigh the
    11·1 answer
  • 3. Means v. Clardy Case (Law Studies)<br><br> Could Means and Barry recover on any other theory?
    15·1 answer
  • Who acts as the jury in an impeachment trial?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!