The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
- <u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/8369124
Answer:
Affectionate
Explanation:
I took the quiz here is a screenshot
Shan is considered to be a first person narrator because he both tells the story and appears in it.
A first-person narrator would obviously use the first person pronoun (I) to refer to him/herself. So, the entire story is told from this person's point of view, using that particular pronoun. E.g. 'I saw him standing there...' is an example of a first person narration which Shan is an example of. If he were talking about someone else, it would be third-person narration.
Answer: If you describe someone as nonchalant, you mean that they appear not to worry or care about things and that they seem very calm.
Explanation:
The answer for that part of speech is preposition