When one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a <u>preexisting duty</u> and not valid consideration.
<h3>What is a valid consideration?</h3>
A valid consideration is a price paid in exchange for goods or services or a promise to do (or abstain from) something.
A valid consideration must be significant, adequate, and unconditional.
Thus, when one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a <u>preexisting duty</u> and not valid consideration.
Learn more about valid considerations at brainly.com/question/1387188 and brainly.com/question/1697686
#SPJ1
Answer:
maybe the answer is b. helping minimize the education gap
subscribes to iwpp subscribes to iwpp subscribes to iwpp subscribes to iwpp subscribes to iwpp subscribes to iwpp subscribes to iwpp
Answer:
Explanation:
the power to commission officers, as applied in practice, does not mean that the President is under constitutional obligation to commission those whose appointments have reached that stage, but merely that it is he and no one else who has the power to commission them, and that he may do so at his discretion. Under the doctrine of Marbury v. Madison, the sealing and delivery of the commission is a purely ministerial act which has been lodged by statute with the Secretary of State, and which may be compelled by mandamus unless the appointee has been in the meantime validly removed. By an opinion of the Attorney General many years later, however, the President, even after he has signed a commission, still has a locus poenitentiae and may withhold it; nor is the appointee in office till he has this commission. This is probably the correct doctrine.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
The drivers don't pay attention and they end up hitting a biker on the side of the road.
