It means the personal freedom to follow whatever religion you choose, or
NO religion if that's your choice, in any way you want as long as you don't
bother other people, without any interference from laws or other people,
and without any penalty or discrimination no matter what your choice is.
That seems like such common sense that it's hard to understand that
in huge parts of the world, that's not the way it is at all.
The answer is Moral Panic
Also called 'Public Fear', it is described as a collective Public anxiety or a feeling of threat towards a particular situation which they believe can completely destroy the society they live in.
In history, there has been several cases of Moral Panic starting from early times when e.g. the Japanese saw foreigners as a threat or when so-called witches were burned in Europe.
Recent moral panic examples include the threat of Communism, HIV as a 'gay' disease and the threat of Global warming.
In history, many governments have created 'Moral Panic' as a propaganda tool in wars and to deviate public perception.
thought it was unconstitutional and argued against it,
The correct answer is that Jane is more friendly and sociable than Denise. When we get a positive stimuli from a person, we are more likely to open up and feel happier which will lead to us being more sociable to other people. When we feel that the other person does not like us, we tend to close up, doubt ourselves and therefore look less friendly.
William Dunbar, ‘To the City of London’.
London, thou art of townes A per se.
Soveraign of cities, seemliest in sight,
Of high renoun, riches and royaltie;
Of lordis, barons, and many a goodly knyght;
Of most delectable lusty ladies bright;
Of famous prelatis, in habitis clericall;
Of merchauntis full of substaunce and of myght:
London, thou art the flour of Cities all …
