The resolution of the Supreme Court Case of West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette was a landmark decision reached by the court, which stated that the right of freedom of speech provided by the First Amendment legimated students to refuse to salute the US flag or to spout the The Pledge of Allegiance of the flag if they attended a public school. It is therefore not mandatory, and more important, not considered a criminal offence to refuse to perform publicly patriotic demonstration acts.
The court victory was achieved by the Jehovah's Witnesses who, due to the prescriptions of their religion, could not salute or pledge to symbols. The Supreme Court ruling decided that the state should not have the power to oblige citizens to express themselves in a certain manner. Therefore, it is a clear defense to the right of speech, and it proves how the legal and judicial instruments guarantee it for citizens.
Answer:
1. If a man brings an accusation against another man, charging him with murder, but cannot prove it, the accuser shall be put to death.
2. If a man has accused another of laying a spell upon him, but has not proved it, the accused shall go to the sacred river, he shall plunge into the sacred river, and if the sacred river shall conquer him, he that accused him shall take possession of his house. If the sacred river shall show his innocence and he is saved, his accuser shall be put to death.
3. If a man bears false witness in a case, or does not establish the testimony that he has given, if that case is case
Explanation:
Answer:
Any state that was a net producer of manufactured goods supported the tariff, since it targeted imported products. So the MidAtlantic states supported it, since they benefited.
Brainlist Pls!
Boats in the ocean and chart plotting
Taking into account the original statement: "Based on the information in the charts, which of the following conclusions can you draw?"
A. The Court by its actions is creating more law than the Congress.
B. The results in the graphs stem from the Senate's reluctance to confirm judicial nominees.
C. The Court overturns laws more often than it follows stare decisis.
D. The court has issued more conservative rulings when it overturns prior Court precedents.
The answer is: D.
Hope this helps.
