As a result of the demand increasing only slightly compared to the reduction in price, the demand must be <u>inelastic</u>.
<h3>Why is the demand inelastic?</h3><h3 />
The demand is considered to be inelastic if the price elasticity is less than 1.
The price elasticity is:
= (%Change in quantity/% Change in price)
Solving gives:
= 15 / 200 ÷ 0.50 / 3.50
= -0.525
In conclusion, the demand for the shakes is inelastic.
Find out more on inelastic demand at brainly.com/question/1899986.
About ninety percent of worldwide stocks of tuna, cod, and other large ocean fishes have disappeared in the last 50 years.
Despite being present in every ocean in the world, tuna and other fishes have started disappearing. The North Atlantic, South Atlantic, as well as the Mediterranean Sea, have the worst conditions for the majority of fish species.
Bluefin, albacore, and yellowfin tuna stocks have drastically decreased as a result of years of overfishing for American and European markets. Although the Atlantic fisheries is heavily regulated, illegal fishing off the shore of coastal seas persists, particularly close to Africa, where impoverished nations cannot afford the patrols required to execute the law.
However, tuna populations cod and other large fish oceans are declining even in the world's largest oceans, and some face extinction due to the continuous pressure of intensive commercial fishing.
To learn more about overfishing click here :
brainly.com/question/5142437
#SPJ4
It is because he is paying money so it is a expense
Answer:
Journal Entry
01 July Debit Investment $240 million Credit Bank $200 million Credit Discount on investment $40 million
31 Dec Debit Bank $7,2 Million Debit Discount on Bond $0.8 million Credit Interest Income $8 million
Debit Fair Value loss on investment $30 million Credit Investment $30 million
Explanation:
Interest is received semiannually
6%/2 = 3%
interest = $240 million * 3% =7,200,000
8%/2 = 4%
Interest market $200 million * 4% =8,000,000
Fair value loss = 240 million - 210 million
= 30 million loss because cost is greater than fair value
Answer:
d. Firm A will spend $4,000.
Explanation:
Since Firm B cost of Cleanup before it gets the the river is less than the cost of pollution permits, it will choose to clean up its pollution.
However, since Firm A cleanup cost per ton ($100) is greater than the cost of the pollution permit, it will choose to buy permits.
Maximum Allowable Number of Permits=40
Therefore, Firm A will clean up 10 Tons and dump 40 Tons of Waste.
Cost =(10 Tons *$100)+(40 Tons * $75)
=$(1000+3000)
=$4000.
Firm A will spend $4000.
