Answer:
In Schenck v. United States, the Supreme Court <u><em>ruled that bans on dangerous speech were constitutional.</em></u>
Explanation:
In the 1919 Supreme Court case of Schenck v. the United States, the court deemed the actions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer as unconstitutional. It deemed them criminals for trying to obstruct the government's drafting of men for war and that it is an act against the security of the nation.
This case revolves around the claim that the obstruction of Schenck and Baer's free speech was unconstitutional and they have the right to express their opinions. But the court insisted that since the leaflets they distributed were against national security, the First Amendment doesn't apply to them.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.
I belive it 20 years of age
In problem solving, a method that always produces a problem solution (though not necessarily very efficiently) is known as algorithm. The algorithm is a defined procedure (set of step-by-step procedures ) that provides the correct answer to a particular problem and <span>yields the best possible answer every time. </span>This method is often expressed in the form of a graph.
Answer: I believe that the answer you're looking for is the Sherman Anti-Trust Act
Explanation:
When selecting group members for problem-solving, the people
that may be qualified or included are the following;
-
An individual or group that could provide
assistance or contribute to the process
-
The person can provide impact on the outcomes
that will likely occur
