Answer:
Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a complex interplay of ideological, political, and economic factors, which led to shifts between cautious cooperation and often bitter superpower rivalry over the years. The distinct differences in the political systems of the two countries often prevented them from reaching a mutual understanding on key policy issues and even, as in the case of the Cuban missile crisis, brought them to the brink of war.
The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. Although the United States embarked on a famine relief program in the Soviet Union in the early 1920s and American businessmen established commercial ties there during the period of the New Economic Policy (1921–29), the two countries did not establish diplomatic relations until 1933. By that time, the totalitarian nature of Joseph Stalin's regime presented an insurmountable obstacle to friendly relations with the West. Although World War II brought the two countries into alliance, based on the common aim of defeating Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union's aggressive, antidemocratic policy toward Eastern Europe had created tensions even before the war ended.
The Soviet Union and the United States stayed far apart during the next three decades of superpower conflict and the nuclear and missile arms race. Beginning in the early 1970s, the Soviet regime proclaimed a policy of détente and sought increased economic cooperation and disarmament negotiations with the West. However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. These tensions continued to exist until the dramatic democratic changes of 1989–91 led to the collapse during this past year of the Communist system and opened the way for an unprecedented new friendship between the United States and Russia, as well as the other new nations of the former Soviet Union.
Explanation:
Harlemagne se dio cuenta de la importancia del aprendizaje y ha sido considerado por los historiadores como el patrocinador de la educación medieval. Ordenó la creación de escuelas que conduzcan a la expansión del sistema educativo. También se tomaron medidas para revitalizar las escuelas existentes, estandarizar el plan de estudios en todos. Espero que esto pueda ayudar. :)
Answer:
Cannon-Bard theory of emotion; James-Lange theory of emotion.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, if an individual sees a crocodile in the swamp he may be lead to feel fear whilst running away at the same time. This is explained by the Cannon-Bard theory of emotion. But, on the opposite side, we have the James-Lange theory of emotion which states that the individual would be afraid because they are, in fact, running away. Basically, the Cannon-Bard theory states that we feel physiological consequences (such as sweat, accelerated heart rate, etc.) when we feel emotions, whereas the James-Lange theory states the opposite: we feel an emotion when we have the physiological effect (we feel fear because we are running, sweating, with our hearth accelerated, etc.).
Answer: Karen is most likely using a STRUCTURED INTERVIEW.
Explanation: A structured interview commonly used in survey research is a type of formal meeting, in person, for the assessment of a candidate or applicant that each individual is presented with the same exact question in the same order.
This is a means of collecting data for a statistical survey. The choice of answers to the questions is often fixed. Though open-ended questions can also be included within a structured interview.
Answer:
A the mass of the object is too small
Explanation:
If the masses of the objects are too small, then the interaction between the two is hard to detect.
Hope this helps! I tried my best!
