1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
soldier1979 [14.2K]
3 years ago
11

For each of the following argument, indicate whether it is valid or invalid, strong or weak.?

Social Studies
1 answer:
kolezko [41]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. Invalid and weak

2. Invalid and strong.

Explanation:

The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.

Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.

You might be interested in
Regarding the economy, what are the terms expand and contract generally used to describe?
emmainna [20.7K]

Answer:

Fluctuations in the economy is the correct answer.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What was president Kennedy's legislative agenda known as?
Julli [10]
It was called the New Frontier
6 0
3 years ago
What was the result of British rule in India?
shtirl [24]

Answer:The British were able to take control of India mainly because India was not united. The British signed treaties and made military and trading alliances with many of the independent states that made up India.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be allowed to reinterpret the law to meet changing social conditions ? Explain your r
Marta_Voda [28]
Well, before you start, you need to choose a side. If you are confused on the phrasing, it is simply asking:

Do you agree that the Supreme Court should be able to think of the law differently during a case to fit with current views?

After that, start thinking of why.

Yes, they should, the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution to change as societal views changed.

No, they shouldn't, just because societal views are changing, what we need for our country to run smoothly is the same as it has been,


Hope I could help!
6 0
3 years ago
• How did westward expansion lead to increased conflicts between the North and South over slavery? What compromises did the Nort
meriva

Answer:

Expansion lead to economic promise and fueled the manifest destiny

Explanation:

The north contained a lot of abolitionists while the south was commonly pro-slavery, this increased sectional tension because each side wanted to see their ideals extended into the west.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What limited the colonies from expanding west of the Appalachian mountains in 1763
    5·1 answer
  • Type a personality ist to ___ as type b personality is to ___
    6·1 answer
  • Sociologist Max Weber divided those who work for wages into two classes. The __________ class consists of skilled, semiskilled,
    12·2 answers
  • The real cynics are the ones who tell you everything's gonna be all right
    5·1 answer
  • What are two risk behaviors that pose a threat to the health of teens today?
    14·1 answer
  • Define the “last mile problem” that the speaker cites in the video. Explain one of the examples he uses to illustrate this probl
    14·1 answer
  • How is putting garbage in recycling bin a major ecological problem
    5·2 answers
  • The purpose of flashbacks is to…
    7·1 answer
  • Why was north america do valuable and desired by both yhe french and the english.
    5·1 answer
  • How do classroom design and materials foster learning and self-regulation of young children?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!