1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivan
3 years ago
11

Read Captain Charles D. Sigsbee’s account of the sinking of the USS Maine, given in 1899. This is a reliable source mainly becau

se it is dated 1899, which was only a year after the ship’s sinking. it is based on secondhand information about the Maine sinking. it appeared in a fictional story about the sinking of the Maine. it was written by a person who was on board during the sinking.
History
2 answers:
mafiozo [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It was written by a person who was on board during the sinking or D

Explanation:

Edge2020

Lunna [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

ddddd

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Why was the Jamestown colony able to prosper in spite of many hardships?
belka [17]
Jamestown survived due to good leadership, cash crops such as tobacco, and the creation of the House of Burgesses. Hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
When Texas leaders met in San Felipe, who did they choose as a governor for Texas and who did they choose to lead the Texas army
7nadin3 [17]
Henry Smith it was led by Sam Houston
3 0
3 years ago
HURRY PLEASE!!! why did Karl Marx blame capitalism , and how did he propose to it​
Alexandra [31]

Answer:

Karl Marx – he was, on the one hand, the theorist of history whose theories have today largely gained acceptance. The idea that tools and the mode of production of a society determine its political and social structure, and that human thought is formed by the use of tools and moral positions by interests – insights which Marx and Engels encapsulated in the concept of “historical materialism” – have found their way into many individual sciences, into sociology, educational theory, psychology, the study of religion, law, literary theory, engineering and the cognitive sciences, to name only a few.

It has been different with Kapital, Marx’s most important work. No work of social science has so strongly fuelled intellectual debate in the last 150 years and exercised so powerful an effect on politics. The European workers’ movement, the Bolshevik revolutionaries, the liberation movements of the Third World – all appeal to Marx’s Kapital, which studied not only the fine mechanics of capitalism but also seemed to prophesy its end. But precisely for this reason no other theory has been so obdurately ignored by mainstream economics, especially in the years of the rivalry between global systems.

THE CAPITALISTS ARE THE DRIVEN OF THE SYSTEM

Today, after the end of the Cold War and in the age of climate crisis, of chronic underemployment, of global inequality, of financial speculation and of weak growth, it has long been not only surviving leftists who talk of the end of capitalism. In economics, word of “secular stagnation” is spreading, and at the world summit of the capitalist elite the sentence “The capitalist system no longer fits into this world” was making the rounds.

In Das Kapital, Marx lays claim to having discovered “the economic law of motion of modern society”. It is, first of all, a law of progress: capital-driven economy, as the sketch in the Communist Manifesto predicts, “has created more massive and colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together”; it has fostered technology and science and created the world market. But the actors in this economy, the capitalists, are driven men: at the risk of bankruptcy, they must develop the productive forces, perpetuate innovation, press out of the workers as much output as possible and exploit the raw materials of the earth as rationally as possible so as to transform them into commodities. Thus capitalism creates the conditions for a world without want and hunger. But under the systemic constraint to maximize surplus value and drive on growth, this mode of production can in the long run “develop only by simultaneously undermining the original sources of all wealth – the soil and the worker”.

Explanation:

There you go, you'll find the answer somewhere in there :)

8 0
3 years ago
Why was the invention of writing in early civilizations significant?
pickupchik [31]
Nooo it’s b because it allowed common people
8 0
3 years ago
What does the term xenophobic mean?
sergejj [24]

Explanation:

fear of a certain race in a particular community

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one of john calvin's major teachings?
    9·1 answer
  • Why were sam adams and john hancock frustrated with government policies in the mid-1760s?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true about the end of slavery?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the causes and effects of proxy wars within Cuba?
    10·1 answer
  • What is another name for the strips that join the glass together?
    10·1 answer
  • True/False Indicate whether the sentence or statement is true (A) or false (B). 1. In April 1865, Johnston and Lee both saw that
    15·1 answer
  • A novel has been written by her. (PASSIVE OR ACTIVE)​
    13·1 answer
  • 6. Give reasons. a) Indian feudalism was responsible for the emergence of the regional kingdoms. b) The art of sculpture achieve
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the Boston Tea Party an important event in history?
    6·2 answers
  • Which late 1940s event prompted the United States to take steps to protect itself from Soviet espionage? the detonation of a bom
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!