1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill115 [55]
2 years ago
12

What was the most important difference between the supreme court’s rulings in Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v. Board of education

?
History
2 answers:
Bad White [126]2 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

The courts interpretation of whether the Equal protection clause allowed racial segregation. Explanation: In the Plessy vs. Ferguson case (1896) the Supreme Court justices ruled that "separate but equal" facilities for blacks and white citizens were not a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment.

mezya [45]2 years ago
4 0

Answer

The courts interpretation of whether the Equal protection clause allowed racial segregation.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The Connecticut compromise is also referred to as the great compromise. True or False
VikaD [51]
False The Connecticut and the Great compromise were two different things
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT. What is coup? Question 3 options:
Licemer1 [7]
I think the answer is A
6 0
4 years ago
What statement best highlights why the south-central region was over-farmed contributing to the Dust Bowl?
Kruka [31]
The Dust Bowl endured about 10 years. Its essential zone of effect was on the southern Plains. The northern Plains were not so gravely affected, but rather regardless, the dry spell, windblown tidy and farming decay were no outsiders toward the north. 
Below are the statements:
- the interest for grain developed amid WWI 
- rich soil in the region delivered astounding products 
- The Homestead Act urged pilgrims to guarantee arrive
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Vice President John C. Calhoun opposed President Jackson over nullification. true or false?
trapecia [35]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Why might Machiavelli have argued that political activity should not be restricted by moral principles?
marta [7]
Machiavelli believed in political activity should not be restricted by moral principles. He thought this because he thought it should be free from morality. He thought that politics should write its own rules and be free from morality. 
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 40 POINTS PLEASE EXPLAIN
    15·2 answers
  • The box that bills are first put in when they start in the house
    8·1 answer
  • The Boxer Rebellion in 1900 was an attempt to..
    15·2 answers
  • 9.) Which of the following is NOT an innovative concept used by Henry Ford?
    12·2 answers
  • ASAP IM GONNA FAIL
    8·2 answers
  • What drug causes slow movements and loss of sense of balance
    9·2 answers
  • Question 8 (4 points)
    10·2 answers
  • Please help
    13·1 answer
  • I have called for personal sacrifice. I am assured of the willingness of almost all Americans to respond to that call. A part of
    13·2 answers
  • After the 1880s, what was a major new source of labor for American Factories
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!