The bet character analysis is
the lawyer is seen to be persistent, intelligent, and self motivating
the banker likes to be in a position of authority and likes to wield power over others
Explanation:
More than any other aspect of U.S. government structure, federalism contributes significantly to innovation in state, local and national government alike.1 However, it is unlikely that the contemporary impacts of federalism in postindustrial America were fully anticipated by the framers of the U.S. constitution. The Founders were driven to a much greater extent by a desire to strike a balance in political power between a nascent national government and the several pre-existing state governments than in promoting innovation and the capacity to adapt to ever changing socio-economic and environmental circumstances. The adoption of a federal form of government at the outset of our nation’s history reflected an appreciation for the cultural heterogeneity that characterized the original thirteen states.2 As the intergovernmental relationships between the federal government and the several states have evolved over time, however, federalism in America has repeatedly proven to serve as an important institutional asset in the service of sustainability.
This chapter will demonstrate how a variety of incentive structures propel state and local governments toward greater open-mindedness, experimentation, and learning from experience than is generally the case with the national government. Unlike the more insulated federal government, the several states and their many local governments face increasingly vexing and complex social and economic challenges which cannot be brushed aside in favor of engagement in the rough-and-tumble of global politics and national partisan competition; citizens in our towns, cities, counties and states frequently demand that action be taken to address their immediate concerns for the quality of life where they live, and they tend to expect tangible results from their state and local governments.
Law enforcement services and community safety are good examples of such concerns for immediate tangible results. When criminal activity increases in a state or local jurisdiction, citizens often call for stricter laws, stiffer penalties for violations, and more robust enforcement; the sidestepping of issues and the shifting of blame to others are generally not acceptable dodges of responsibility to citizens calling for effective action. The heightened visibility of problems at the state and local level, and the demand for quick solutions to those problems, commonly place a heavy burden on state and local governments for timely action. While this often intense atmosphere can be quite stressful for state and local policymakers, some of the very best and most innovative solutions to tough problems emerge from this setting – leading to the development of solutions that promote the sustainability of states and local communities in one location that are often copied, modified and implemented in other state and local government settings across the nation.
The term federalism refers to a formal legal relationship between one or more levels of government vertically organized, and a whole host of relationships between similar levels of government horizontally organized. As Watts notes, the highly regarded late scholar of federalism Daniel Elazar viewed federalism as a complex contractual arrangement; for Elazar federalism represents a form of “shared rule plus self rule — and a balance between cooperation and competition among the general and constituent governments.”3 The structure of American federalism was initially intended to protect pre-existing units of government (the states), and serve as an authoritative method of assigning or dividing responsibilities among the levels of government. In contrast, contemporary approaches to American federalism — the result of over a century of change — clearly emphasize collaboration among and across units of government while continuing to respect the distinctive priorities and needs of populations in different state and local jurisdictions. Today, an expansive and flexible understanding of American federalism represents a clear opportunity for innovation rather than representing a strict limitation on what actions any particular level of government is allowed to take.
Answer: To compare and contrast the themes of two different literary works, you should follow a specific process.
The first step in the process is to A: Make a list of the literary elements found in both works.
Literary devices are the structures author uses to convey his message through his writing. He does this to make his writing more appealing to the readers and catch their attention. “Literary Elements” (like plot, protagonist, dialogue, mood and so on) and “Literary Techniques” (like metaphor, simile, hyperbole) are two kinds of Literary devices.
Now, when we compare two literary works, the first step would be to make a list of all the Literary elements in both the works. This would give us an idea of how the plot, setting, mood is being used in both the works. Also, who are the protagonists and antagonists of the stories.
Answer:
I don't think the paragraph catches attention.
Explanation:
The paragraph appears to be a persuasive text, and to make your text successful in changing others' mindsets, it needs to be appealing enough for the readers to go through all the way. It does follow TBEAR elements, but it is too dull to change anything. To make it worthy of readers' attention, you have to keep evidence short. Ignore the parts of the evidence that is not necessary.
<em>If I got it wrong, I will return the points to you through another question. Have a good day! :)</em>
Answer:
B. Nia overcomes her fear and learns to fly.
Explanation:
Here, our task is to determine which ending makes the most sense and thus is most likely to take place.
Nia overcoming her fear and learning how to fly would be the correct option. Every bird has to learn how to fly. Otherwise, it wouldn't be able to thrive and survive. Overcoming our fears is never easy, but sometimes, it must be done. The story that tells about how Nia beat her own fears would send a good message to those reading it, especially children.
The rest of the options are not as realistic or wouldn't represent the ending of the story. Magic doesn't exist, and her overcoming her fears like that would make the message of the story less effective. Siblings often mock but don't want to harm each other. This is why her being pushed out of the nest wouldn't make much sense. Besides, just like option D, this wouldn't be the ending of the story. Nia would probably confront her siblings before the resolution, which is why option D is incorrect.