Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
one way to describe the prime version of ABCD is that the sides are all 3 times that of the non- prime version. So they are when scaled by 3 .. the same.
Answer:
Yes it is, because...
Step-by-step explanation:
This is an inequality, so you can treat it as an algebraic expression.
The first step is to multiple both sides by 2, to get rid of the 2 on the left side.
Your equation will now look like this:
y >= 2y - 22
The next step is to get all the y variables to one side, now that its a lot more simplified. Subtract 2y from both sides to get:
-y >= -22
Finally, cancel out the negative on both sides of the equation to get the y as a positive y, all by itself. This will get you:
y <= 22
REMINDER: when you divide by a negative number, such as in this case dividing by -1 on both sides, the inequality sign will flip!
y = 18 works because it is less than 22. (:
Answer:




Step-by-step explanation:
Given
See attachment for proper format of table
--- Sample
A = Supplier 1
B = Conforms to specification
Solving (a): P(A)
Here, we only consider data in sample 1 row.
In this row:
and 
So, we have:



P(A) is then calculated as:


Solving (b): P(B)
Here, we only consider data in the Yes column.
In this column:
and 
So, we have:



P(B) is then calculated as:


Solving (c): P(A n B)
Here, we only consider the similar cell in the yes column and sample 1 row.
This cell is: [Supplier 1][Yes]
And it is represented with; n(A n B)
So, we have:

The probability is then calculated as:


Solving (d): P(A u B)
This is calculated as:

This gives:

Take LCM


P^2 could also have -4 as an answer. Any time a number is squared, it is positive
I’m not sure if this is correct but here is a picture of what I think the answer might be. P.S my handwriting is not neat