War on drugs breaks through to perpetuate crime myths.America is trying a war on drugs for the last 100 years or so but it has not succeeded fully so far. They have been locking black <em>people in jail </em>perpetually but it is perhaps not helping the cause of war on drugs.This can be considered first myth.
Increasing the <em>severity of punishment</em> is also not helping the cause of war on drugs.This can be thought of second myth.US Criminal Justice system has changed over the years.
Domestic impact of war on drugs is profound.Its consequences do not stop at the border.Prohibition of drugs affects health,crime,corruption and violence.Moreover,these effects are self perpetuating.
One reason why historians have a high opinion about the mongols is because mongols began riding at an early age and started hunting as soon as they can hold a bow and the Mongol Army continually trained the troops in rotations, formations, and diversity tactics they also trained for many circumstances as they could have so they could react fast while in battle and be sure to any tactic of the enemy
Hope This Helps You :)
1. The Mexicas' (correct name of the Aztecs) religion, particularly the belief in feeding the Sun/War God, Hutzilopochtli, required human blood in order to stay alive and continue its journey across the skies, had the effect of making the capture of enemy prisoners a priority in war, instead of merely disabling or eliminating them (a far easier task for it exposes warriors less to wounds and fatal injuries). In battle against the <em>Conquistadors, </em>the Mexica practice of seeking out prisoners of war in battle turned out to be a distinct handicap readily exploited by the Spaniards.
2. The Incas managed to maintain control of the vast territories under their control by means of a an excellent communication system consisting of paved roads across the empire, the establishment of fortified military bases garrisoned by Incan warriors and the efficient use of messengers and their distinct record system known as <em>quipu.</em>
<em>3. </em>Both the Mexicas and the Incas started out as small, poor yet resourceful and ambitious peoples who were able to rebel against foreign domination and expand their domains through the creation and maintenance of highly efficient, aggressive and disciplined armies.
Mexicas and Incans differed in the use of their armies after consolidating their empires: the Mexicas waged wars yearly with the purpose of capturing as many prisoners of war as possible in order to offer their lives as sacrifice to their Sun/War God Huitzilopochtli. Conversely, the Incans used their army to garrison fortified posts strategically located throughout their empire in order to avert any chance of rebellion. Also, the way political and military power was exerted was different in each civilization. The Mexicas were ruled by about half a dozen lords called "tlatoanis" who in turn appointed an overlord called "great tlatoani," so their government system was an elective monarchy of sorts. On the other hand, the emperor of the Incas called "Sapa Inca" inherited the power from his father and would usually murder his brothers as they were his rivals for the supreme power. Thus, the Incas had a hereditary monarchy, a more traditional kind of government.
Answer:
I have to say It's A or B
Explanation:
:)
