Answer:
If we don't elect Mrs. Smith to the senate, we will definitely see a rise in taxes.
Explanation:
According to Clinical psychologist Rian McMullin, "Logical fallacies are unsubstantiated assertions that are often delivered with a conviction that makes them sound as though they are proven facts." The statement above uses the rise in taxes which is something that people are scared of. The assertion appears to be factual but it simply a campaign style to promote a candidate.
Answer:
The third option.
Explanation:
Any statement that is talking about the future is considered as future tense. We know that this statement is future tense because we can see the keyword “will”. This implies that they are talking about the future.
I recommend that you research more on these keywords as they will help you a lot in the future. Have a good day!
Answer:
- The court should look to the intention of the founders.
Explanation:
Originalism is associated with the legal doctrine that believes in interpreting or determining the meaning of the words, phrases, or statements mentioned in the Constitution in context of 'the intention of the founders or authors' for ratification of such a clause or law in the Constitution. The originalist philosophy says that the constitution is required to be interpreted on the basis of initial/original understanding or intent of the founders instead of interpreting it in the present context. Therefore, the court should determine the meaning of the constitutional phrase on this philosophy and 'look to the intention of the founders'.
For most people, work is the center of life.
It is the main supplier of money that they could use to buy food, pay their bills, or to use for enjoyment. All those things combined will make people afraid of discarding their work.
Something unpleasant or dreadful is happening or being observed (/sensed (such as smell))
