Answer:
if i see the document, I'd be happy to answer your question :)
(This isn’t going to be an actual paragraph answer - don’t put this as your answer, this is just some guidance) I don’t know if you’re familiar with Machiavelli’s “The Prince” but in the text Machiavelli says that all a man really care about is his property (or something like that, I’d fact check it/get an actual quote). Locke very much so supported a absolute monarch and “The Prince” is essentially a guide of sorts for absolute rulers -> Locke was a fan of Machiavelli’s work. Thomas Jefferson on the other hand did not support an absolute ruler (he was of English decent, like other American colonists, and England was a constitutional monarchy, hince the American constitution/government) and therefore probably didn’t support Machiavelli’s work but he was a fan of Locke (a lot of the founding fathers were fans of enlightenment thinkers, John Locke was an elightened thinker) so Jefferson took his ideas from Locke.
When the Europeans had arrived in their kingdom and encountered them, they were able to know and learn about them and in a way they had taken advantage of the existence of slavery, making them turn into slaves and to be set as a property for their owners.
World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history in terms of total dead, with some 75 million people casualties including military and civilians. Many civilians died because of deliberate genocide, massacres, mass-bombings, disease, and starvation.
Answer:
The formation of a mutual aid society created a different avenue to have these needs fulfilled. In addition, orphans and widows related to members of the societies were often offered support. The mutual aid societies also served an important cultural function in many black communities.
