<span>
It consumed him to the point that he decided not to run for re-election
in 1968. By the end of his administration, we were in very deep in
Vietnam, and the war was not going well.
</span>
Answer:
The neolithic revolution is the agriculture revolution of the many human cultures and larger population possible.
Explanation:
Neolithic revolution is indicates the various types of plants and animal to starting in the diversity of food available in agriculture revolution.
- Neolithic revolution involved the limited food product techniques to the small transformed to the dominate villages and town.
- Neolithic revolution provide the basis administration and political structures non portable development agriculture.
- Neolithic revolution is the sequence of the relation at the various neolithic sites debate and various place and outcome.
- Neolithic revolution denote is the great significance change and the community practices adopted and affecting.
- This revolution is to contain the display of power feasts to the expert dominance and to required the technology of the agriculture.
- Neolithic revolution is performed by the depending the locally available and influenced by the local culture.
- Neolithic revolution is to contrast the community into forced the animals and together with seeds.
- Neolithic revolution is the process is used development of the agriculture with the climate for humanity survive.
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
