Answer: Kant’s Categorical Imperative
Explanation:
Kant's categorical imperative expresses that there is an inner force within the human being that is capable of governing his behaviors, that is, that the person can decide which behaviors are moral and which are not. This concept was the basis for the creation of various theories about morality. This concept of Kant falls within the framework of a global law since it understands that regardless of history, morality must be present.
As for the taking of small amounts of office supply, even these not representing a loss for the company are not correct to take them. If these were not given by the company itself, the person should not take them as doing so could be labeled as stealing. Stealing is taking the belongings of a person without their consent and even the object has taken does not represent any importance for a person, it should not be taken without their authorization.
Answer:
With the application of State Decisis Doctrine the case cannot be dismissed.
Explanation:
Stare Decisis Doctrine is the one that will provide legal support to promote the legal bases that will allow the case to continue on trial in California. This is because the cause presented in the question above, presents an inexorable selection forum throughout the national territory, in this case, if AOL committed a violation of the public order in a very intense way, the judges cannot file or transfer the case to another state, but they are required to continue the trial within the state where the violation occurred.
Hi there
This is a smart question :)
Anyway the correct answer is : D
I hope that's help:0 Please rate down here ↓↓
C. Today’s terrorists have access to modern technology and weapons
Answer:
The United States is a democracy, but it is not a true democracy. Instead, it is a representative democracy . The common forms of democracy are direct democracy and representative democracy.
Explanation:
