Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer:
A is the answer of that questions
Answer:
The lack of formal economic opportunities, high rates of malnutrition, illness, poor education and legacy of entrenched political conflicts and instability
Explanation:
The lack of formal economic opportunities(lack of resources to fund the opportunities), combined with the legacy of entrenched political conflicts and instability, as well as high rates of malnutrition, illness(Malaria, Yellow Fever..), and poor education(Kids don't have access to normal studies most of the time and if they do the material is outdated) , make the DR Congo one of the hardest places on earth to raise a family.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
This was a huge triumph for the pharaoh's, showing their power and control over the people.
