<u>Part A</u>
<u />
<u>Answer:</u>
$207,021
<u />
<u>Explanation:</u>
The balance on the account at the end of the year 2020 is $1,000,000
The question asks us to calculate the balance on the account at the end of the year 1970, which is exactly 50 years ago.
We would simply discount the $1,000,000 by using an interest rate of 3.2%
=
= $207,021
<u>Part B</u>
<u></u>
<u>Answer:</u>
$17,892.88
<u>Explanation:</u>
We have the value at year 1970 which is $207,021
Now to calculate the annual payment (PMT) we would plug the following values in the financial calculator,
PV = 0
N = 10
FV =207021
I/Y = 3.2
PMT = ?
PMT = $17,892.88
https://www.calculator.net/finance-calculator.html?ctype=contributeamount&ctargetamountv=207021&cyearsv=10&cstartingprinciplev=0&cinterestratev=3.2&ccontributeamountv=1000&ciadditionat1=end&printit=0&x=102&y=11
Answer:
The amount of cash for the payment of dividends during the year is B. $40,000
Explanation:
To Determine the amount of cash for the payment of dividends during the year, we open a Dividends Payable T - Account and find the amount via <em>missing figure approach</em> as follows:
Debits :
Cash (<em>Balancing figure</em>) $40,000
Ending of year Dividends Payable $15,000
Totals $55,000
Credits :
Beginning of year Dividends Payable $10,000
Dividends declared during the year $45,000
Totals $55,000
The next guesses of the clerk should be less of red shells and more of white shells.
<h3><u>Decision about less of white and more red shells</u>:</h3>
Given that,
Red shell [r] costs = $0.75 each.
White shell [w] costs = $0.49 each.
Total of 8 shells = $4.70
The clerk guesses that the $4.96 for 4 red shells and 4 white shells is greater than the actual purchase.
Therefore,
The clerk should make use of less red shells, and more of white shells, because the unit costs of red shell is more than the white shell.
Learn more about equations, refer:
brainly.com/question/2574274
Answer:
19.07%
Explanation:
The computation of the total compound return over the 3 years is shown below:
= (1 + investment percentage earned in first year) × (1 + investment percentage earned in second year) × (1 + investment percentage loss in second year)
= (1 + 0.35) × (1 + 0.40) × (1 - 0.37)
= 1.35 × 1.40 × 0.63
= 1.1907
= 19.07%
The wages are quite a bit higher than industry standard. It's about 33% which is 8% higher.